![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Get AJS Updates! |
![]() | |||||||||
Business (Not) As Usual |
||||||||||
What would you do if your employer refused to pay you wages for one
month, two months, then three months? For doña Alba Torres and 5 other
of her co-workers this wasn’t merely a hypothetical question but a
very present and unfair reality. Like many senior citizens in society,
doña Alba‘s job security was precarious at best. For 16 years she
worked at the janitorial company SIMAT laboring away without ever receiving
various legally mandated employment benefits such as over time and an
education bonus for individuals with children in school.
For every sick day she took they would deduce almost triple the amount
she would earn in one day. Her employers would look for any reason,
such as charging her for her uniform, to reduce her already meager $130
monthly salary. “I understand a social security tax, but I wasn’t
receiving any of the benefits!” she protested. Another affected
worker shared, “We are poor people and we are not going to use this
money to buy luxurious things. We need this money to survive.” Not a stranger to working with companies with a poor record of respecting their employees labor rights and known for having an ear to the ground to the plight of janitorial workers in the city, the Labor Project decided it was time to act when Project training lawyer talked with doña Alba through one of the mobile trainings. For six months, journalists and lawyers from the AJS-supported Labor
Project had been putting pressure on the company’s to change its illegal
practices by advocating for the payment of worker benefits for people
like doña Alba. “We had notified the Secretary of Labor of several
infractions SIMAT had been committing, but this was the last straw for
them,” explained AJS-supported Labor Project lawyer, Felix.
The company’s failure to pay three month’s worth of salaries to
these six workers assigned to their very own building was enough to
have the Secretary of Labor cancel their contract with SIMAT, sending
a message loud and clear to the public: violating workers’ rights
is not tolerated as business as usual. Postscript |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||